Bitter Truth of Bail Applications in All High Courts

Analysis of bail cases; Bitter truth of bail applications in all high courts

The outcome of the bail applications was unknown in 80% of the cases researched, and the exact act of the crime was not identifiable in more than 77% of the cases in which the persons were seeking bail.

Across all High Courts, DAKSH analyzed 9,27,896 bail cases that were filed between 2010 and 2021. The median days for the disposal of regular bail cases in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court were 156 days, for the Orissa High Court, 61 days, and for the Bombay High Court, 56 days.

Given the very high number of days it takes to dispose of bail cases (which are generally considered to not require much judicial time or deliberation), the lack of data to understand the reason for the delay is worrying. The data regarding the outcome of bail applications in High Courts was also missing.

In close to 80% of the disposed bail cases in all High Courts, the outcome of the bail appeal—whether it was granted or rejected—was either unclear, or missing, and surprisingly, this figure is 95% in the case of the Bombay High Court. This shows how the High Courts are working in our judicial system.

The State judiciaries are working arbitrarily with regards to the acceptance of bail applications. Many innocent persons are arrested on the basis of wrong F.I.R.s or complaints, and due to the non-consideration of bail applications in time, their right to liberty is badly affected, and their reputation is also tarnished in society. This is an irreparable loss for that person. Bail applications must be considered on a priority basis.

(*Source: Indian judicial data hides more than it reveals in bail cases—an article published in The Hindu, p. 7, August 14, 2023, Mohali edition and DAKSH’s ‘High Court Data portal.)

Article Reviewed by: Dr. Dimple Jindal

Go online for legal updates at www.juscuriam.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

MAHARASHTRA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 481 TO 520)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2016)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 44)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2023)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 281 TO 315)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 10)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2017)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019-1

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

MAHARASHTRA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(1)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2016-2

THE LAW OF ADMINISTRATION (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 19)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 321 TO 360)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH COURTS ACT, 1976 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 23)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2021

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 636)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)