Bitter Truth of Bail Applications in All High Courts

Analysis of bail cases; Bitter truth of bail applications in all high courts

The outcome of the bail applications was unknown in 80% of the cases researched, and the exact act of the crime was not identifiable in more than 77% of the cases in which the persons were seeking bail.

Across all High Courts, DAKSH analyzed 9,27,896 bail cases that were filed between 2010 and 2021. The median days for the disposal of regular bail cases in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court were 156 days, for the Orissa High Court, 61 days, and for the Bombay High Court, 56 days.

Given the very high number of days it takes to dispose of bail cases (which are generally considered to not require much judicial time or deliberation), the lack of data to understand the reason for the delay is worrying. The data regarding the outcome of bail applications in High Courts was also missing.

In close to 80% of the disposed bail cases in all High Courts, the outcome of the bail appeal—whether it was granted or rejected—was either unclear, or missing, and surprisingly, this figure is 95% in the case of the Bombay High Court. This shows how the High Courts are working in our judicial system.

The State judiciaries are working arbitrarily with regards to the acceptance of bail applications. Many innocent persons are arrested on the basis of wrong F.I.R.s or complaints, and due to the non-consideration of bail applications in time, their right to liberty is badly affected, and their reputation is also tarnished in society. This is an irreparable loss for that person. Bail applications must be considered on a priority basis.

(*Source: Indian judicial data hides more than it reveals in bail cases—an article published in The Hindu, p. 7, August 14, 2023, Mohali edition and DAKSH’s ‘High Court Data portal.)

Article Reviewed by: Dr. Dimple Jindal

Go online for legal updates at www.juscuriam.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2000 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018-2

CHHATTISGARH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES EXAM 2020

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -3 Q. NO. 51 TO 75)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018(2)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019-1

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(1) & (2)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 623)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2014)

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 91 TO 135)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 21 Q. NO. 801 TO 840)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2016-2

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2023)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2008

THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 15)

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 44)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)