help Help

Shri Krishna Sharma V. State of West Bengal, 2024

R. Mahalakshmi V. A. V. Anantharaman

Shri Krishna Sharma V. State of West Bengal, 2024:

Bail cannot be cancelled merely due to non-appearance of accused before the Court

Background:

Bail under Section 436 of the CrPC 1973, is a very important provision under Article 21 “Right to life and Liberty” according to our Constitution. The Supreme Court said that not granting Bail is also a violation of right to life and liberty of a person. Similarly if bail is granted once Court cannot cancelled the bail without any proper reason. There is some conditions by which bail is granted to a person, i.e., surrender of passport, not to violate any law, not to involve any offence, not to disturb victim, not to suppress or influence the witnesses relating to the case etc. If any of these conditions are violated the bail will be
cancelled by the Court.

Facts of the Case:

The petitioner of this matter, got his bail in a matter from the High Court of Kolkata. After granting the bail the accused was called to appear before the Court, but due to the huge traffic, the accused was unable to appear before the Ld. Court on time. The High Court of Kolkata cancelled the bail of that accused for this reason. Being aggrieved by this decision of the Ld. Court the accused filed a petition in the Ld. Supreme Court.

Judgement of the Supreme Court:

The three judge bench of the Supreme Court after reviewing all the petitions, submissions and arguments of the both parties came into this conclusion that if bail has been granted, the same can be cancelled if any conditions are violated or liberty is misused. The SC said that merely because the appellant did not appear personally before the Ld. Court on time that could not have been a ground for cancellation of bail. The parameters for granting bail and cancellation of bail are totally different matter. The bail already granted only be cancelled, if it is found that the person has violated any of the conditions or misused
the liberty by influencing the witnesses or tampering the evidence.

Conclusion:

Thus the SC set aside the rejection of bail order passed by the Kolkata High Court by observing the fact that “bail cannot be cancelled merely due to non-appearance of accused before the Court”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH EXCISE ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 16)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE COURT FEES ACT, 1870 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 7)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 01 Q.NO. 1 TO 40)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

THE CHHATTISGARH EXCISE ACT, 1915 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

KERALA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 19)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 351 TO 385)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2018)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

THE MADHYA PRADESH ACCOMODATION CONTROL ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 10)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(2)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 26 TO 50)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 316 TO 350)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2015

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 10)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2020)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

Youtube facebook whatsapp web weather translate google amazon gmail google translate Instagram cricbuzz traductor Hotmail restaurants satta king tiempo twitter googel maps Yandex Sarkari result clima hotels fb yahoo maps chatgpt yahoo mail weather tomorrow Netflix roblox nba wordle tradutor livescore premier league ibomma speed test canva pintrest outlook Instagram login omegle flipkart myntra paypal paytm Alibaba ebay lottery sambad linkedin tiktok shein bbc news real madrid gmail login Walmart ikea cricket snaptik flashscore English to hindi twitch google scholar Barcelona Sarkari Naukri matrimonial shadi lgbtq third gender woman children Advocate barrister vakil supreme court high court commissioner exams ll.b ll.m ugc net law ph.d. m.b.a. graduation degree certificate school additional session judge civil judge justice jurists crime criminology punishment capital sentence death warrant fine constitution of india criminal procedure code civil procedure code evidence act sale of goods act arbitration act all india bar exam lower judiciary higher judiciary additional district attorney contract act amendment act u.s. constitution Canada p r section article schedule judgment vacancy post Porsche louis Vuitton chanel Gucci Hermes dior cartier rolex titan tiffany & co Ferrari estee lauder coach lancome burberry prada omega yves saint Laurent Lamborghini ray-ban Armani Moncler tata reliance Givenchy celine Bentley tag Heuer sk-II can cleef & arpels bulgari Shangri-la lao feng xiang dabur baidyanath cipla birla monte carlo loewe rolls-royce bottega-veneta jaege-leCoulture Maserati valentino dolce & gabbana Salvatore Ferragamo sulwhasso tom ford Maruti Suzuki Hyundai kia intercontinental Tissot aston martin ysl beauty fendi Versace kenzo la mer longines gold price sensex human rights pollution