Z, under the influence of madness, attempts to kill X. Is Z guilty of an offence? Has X the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane?
Z, under the influence of madness, attempts to kill X. Is Z guilty of an offence? Has X the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane?
.
Option A: Z has not committed any offence as per Section 98 of IPC and same right of private defence to X if Z is mad
Option B: As per Section 98 of IPC, X has committed an offence and no right of private defence to X
Option C: Z has committed an offence for not using his mind
Option D: None above
Correct Answer
Option: a
Explanation
The above question is based on Illustration (a) of Section 98, IPC stated below. Section 98 deals with right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc. Illustration (a). Z, under the influence of madness, attempts to kill A; Z is guilty of no offence. But A has the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane.
Sample Mock Tests for Practice
THE LAW OF ADMINISTRATION (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)