X’ and ‘Y’ go to murder ‘Z’. ‘X’ stood on guard with a spear hand but did not hit ‘Z’ at all. ‘Y’ killed ‘Z’.
X’ and ‘Y’ go to murder ‘Z’. ‘X’ stood on guard with a spear hand but did not hit ‘Z’ at all. ‘Y’ killed ‘Z’.
.
Option A: Only ‘Y’ is liable for murder of ‘Z’
Option B: X’ and ‘Y’ both are liable for murder of ‘Z’
Option C: X’ is not liable as he did not reform over act
Option D: Both (a) and (c)
Correct Answer
Option: b
Explanation
It is not necessary that each one of the accused must assault the deceased. It is enough if it is shown that they shared a common intention to commit the offence. Case Laws Nandu Rastogi v State of Bihar AIR 2002 SC 3443, Lord Dacre’s Case (1,Hale P.C. 439).
Sample Mock Tests for Practice
THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)