Question

Which pair of cookie types could each be eaten by at least three different people? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Which pair of cookie types could each be eaten by at least three different people? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Direction: Each group of questions is based on a set of conditions. Choose the response that most accurately and completely answers each question.
At the snack cafe at a party, Ali, Bina, Champak and Diva are eating cookies. There are five kinds of cookies to choose from – chocolate chip cookies, oatmeal cookies, sugar cookies, peanut butter cookies and raisin cookies. Each of these four people eats at least two kinds of cookies. Their choices are governed by the following rules:
At most two of them eat oatmeal cookies At least two of them eat sugar cookies Ali does not eat any sugar cookies Bina and Champak do not eat the same type of cookies
Bina eats chocolate chip cookies Champak eats sugar cookies
No one eats both raisin cookies and sugar cookies
If someone eats raisin cookies, they also eat peanut butter cookies

Option A: Chocolate chip and oatmeal
Option B: Oatmeal and peanut butter
Option C: Chocolate chip and peanut butter
Option D: Oatmeal and sugar.

Correct Answer

Option: c

Explanation

Assorted

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-2

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 481 TO 520)

JHARKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

CHHATTISGARH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2020

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 21 Q. NO. 801 TO 840)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

MAHARASHTRA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 22 Q. NO. 841 TO 874)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 281 TO 315)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018-2

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019-2

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2013)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018(2)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 01 TO 40)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 526 TO 560)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CHHATTISGARH EXCISE ACT, 1915 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2014

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)