Question

Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate hediate to a long term solution? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate hediate to a long term solution? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Direction: Read the following case and answer the questions.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an elec electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request “Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team.”
Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen’s former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience, Lalit has described Kishen as too authoritative to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an alling wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above:
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen to visit a family counsellor.

Option A: II, V, I
Option B: II, III, IV
Option C: II, V, IV
Option D: II, I, V

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 10)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 316 TO 350)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 21 Q. NO. 801 TO 840)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 91 TO 116)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-2

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 26 TO 50)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 481 TO 520)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 20 Q. NO. 761 TO 800)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH EXCISE ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 16)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 05 Q.NO. 161 TO 200)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018(2)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2020)

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 39)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 61 TO 90)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 321 TO 360)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)