Question

When an act is abetted and a different act is done by the person instigated, the abettor is liable for the act done in the same manne and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it, provided

When an act is abetted and a different act is done by the person instigated, the abettor is liable for the act done in the same manne and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it, provided

.

Option A: The act done was a probable consequence of the abetmes irrespective of being committed under the influence of instigation
Option B: The act was done with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment
Option C: The abettor had reasonable ground to believe that a different act may be committed
Option D: All of the above

Correct Answer

Option: b

Explanation

Section 111 of IPC provides for the same. It say that when an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it. Provided that the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment. In option (a) word is respective is not appropriate.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH EXCISE ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 16)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018-2

AIBE-XII-2018-I (BCI-JUN-2018-SET-A) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2018-I)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 316 TO 350)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2009

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES EXAM 2020

THE MADHYA PRADESH ACCOMODATION CONTROL ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 44)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 15)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -3 Q. NO. 51 TO 75)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)