Question

The Supreme Court has held that an advocate cannot claim a lien over a litigation file entrusted to him for his fees no professional can be given the right to withhold the returnable records relating to the work done by him with his clients matter on the strength of any claim for unpaid remuneration. The alternative is the professional concerned can resort to other legal remedies for such unpaid remuneration. Refer to the specific case:

The Supreme Court has held that an advocate cannot claim a lien over a litigation file entrusted to him for his fees no professional can be given the right to withhold the returnable records relating to the work done by him with his clients matter on the strength of any claim for unpaid remuneration. The alternative is the professional concerned can resort to other legal remedies for such unpaid remuneration. Refer to the specific case:

.

Option A: R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma
Option B: V.C. Rangadurai v. D. Gopalan
Option C: Emperor v. Dadu Ram
Option D: G. Naranswamy v. Challapalli

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma, August 22, 2000-The issue in this case was: Has the advocate a lien for his fees on the litigation papers entrusted to him by his client?

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 01 TO 40)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -5 Q. NO. 101 TO 134)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -3 Q. NO. 51 TO 75)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE CHHATTISGARH RENT CONTROL ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-2

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956 (PAPER -01 Q. NO. 1 TO 14)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 351 TO 385)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2020)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

AIBE-XIII-2018-II (BCI-DEC-2018-SET-A) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2018-II)

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 26 TO 50)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

UTTAR PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES LAW EXAM 2018

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2015

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2022)

PUNJAB LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

ODISHA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(1) & (2)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 61 TO 90)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 22 Q. NO. 841 TO 874)