Question

The requirement to give reasons in administrative decisions which affect rights and liabilities has been held to be mandatory by the Supreme Court in:

The requirement to give reasons in administrative decisions which affect rights and liabilities has been held to be mandatory by the Supreme Court in:

.

Option A: S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
Option B: State of Orissa v. Dr. Binapani Devi
Option C: State of Maharashtra v. Jalgaon Municipal Council
Option D: Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 1984-The requirement that reasons be recorded should govern the decisions of an administrative authority exercising quasi- judicial functions irrespective of the fact whether the decision is subject to appeal, revision or judicial review. It may, however, be added that it is not required that the reasons should be as elaborate as in the decision of a Court of law. The extent and nature of the reasons would depend on particular facts and circumstances. What is necessary is that the reasons are clear and explicit so as to indicate that the authority has given due consideration to the points in controversy. Except in cases where the requirement has been dispensed with expressly or by necessary implication, an administrative authority exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions is required to record the reasons for its decision.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

HARYANA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES EXAM 2020

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 269)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 91 TO 116)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 316 TO 350)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

CHHATTISGARH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2020

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 421 TO 455)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2016-2

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2015

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 46 TO 90)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 231)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 135)

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 12)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 456 TO 490)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 526 TO 560)

THE MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 29)