Question

PRINCIPLE 1 : A ‘bailment’ is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned. The person delivering the goods is called the ‘bailor’. The person to whom they are delivered is called the ‘bailee’. PRINCIPLE 2 : In all cases of bailment the bailee is bound to take as much care of the goods bailed to him/her as a person of ordinary prudence would, under similar circumstances, take of his/her own goods of the same bulk, quantity and value as the goods bailed. FACTS : Aparna entered into a contract with Gagan to keep her goods in his warehouse until she was able to find a suitable buyer for them. Gagan kept his own goods also at the same warehouse. One night, certain thieves entered the warehouse and stole the goods of both Gagan and Aparna. It was discovered that even though Gagan had locked the main door, he had carelessly left the windows open and that the thieves had entered through the open windows. Aparna sued Gagan for damages as Gagan had failed to take due care of her goods. Decide.

PRINCIPLE 1 : A ‘bailment’ is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned. The person delivering the goods is called the ‘bailor’. The person to whom they are delivered is called the ‘bailee’. PRINCIPLE 2 : In all cases of bailment the bailee is bound to take as much care of the goods bailed to him/her as a person of ordinary prudence would, under similar circumstances, take of his/her own goods of the same bulk, quantity and value as the goods bailed. FACTS : Aparna entered into a contract with Gagan to keep her goods in his warehouse until she was able to find a suitable buyer for them. Gagan kept his own goods also at the same warehouse. One night, certain thieves entered the warehouse and stole the goods of both Gagan and Aparna. It was discovered that even though Gagan had locked the main door, he had carelessly left the windows open and that the thieves had entered through the open windows. Aparna sued Gagan for damages as Gagan had failed to take due care of her goods. Decide.

.

Option A: Gagan is liable since he left the windows open which shows that he did not take as much care as a person of ordinary prudence
Option B: Gagan is not liable since he took as much care of Aparna’s goods as he took of his own goods
Option C: Gagan is not liable since he locked the door and a person of ordinary prudence cannot be expected to check the windows as well
Option D: None of the above

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

Chapter IX, Section 148 of The Indian Contract Act defined ““Bailment”, “bailor” and “bailee” “

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 623)

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Paper 01: Q. 1 to 25)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 03 Q.NO. 81 TO 120)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2021)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2020)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 421 TO 455)

THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 65)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE CHHATTISGARH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 11)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 21 Q. NO. 801 TO 840)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 91 TO 116)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 269)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 136 TO 180)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-1

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

HARYANA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2010

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

MAHARASHTRA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 07 Q.NO. 241 TO 280)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE COURT FEES ACT, 1870 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 7)