Question

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that “That law does not mandate taking of prior permission for further investigations or carrying out further investigations even after filing of charge-sheet, it being a statutory right of Police”

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that “That law does not mandate taking of prior permission for further investigations or carrying out further investigations even after filing of charge-sheet, it being a statutory right of Police”

.

Option A: State of A.P. Vs. AS Peter
Option B: Balbir Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Option C: State of U.P. Vs. Farid Khan
Option D: Union of India Vs. Padam Narain Agarwal

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

In our view, notwithstanding that a Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence upon a police report submitted under Section 173 of the 1898 Code, the right of the police to further investigate was not exhausted and the police could exercise such right as often as necessary when fresh information came to light. Where the police desired to make a further investigation, the police could express their regard and respect for the court by seeking its formal permission to make further investigation

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 07 Q.NO. 241 TO 280)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 316 TO 350)

THE INDIAN FORESTS ACT, 1927 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 43)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2002

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(2)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

AIBE-XVI-2021-II (BCI-OCT-2021-SET-A) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2021-II)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 246 TO 280)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-1

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 526 TO 560)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2015

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 636)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2001

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)