In which of the following cases, difference between ‘common intention and ‘similar intention’ was discussed by the Privy Council?
In which of the following cases, difference between ‘common intention and ‘similar intention’ was discussed by the Privy Council?
.
Option A: Mahboob Shah Vs. King Emperor
Option B: Barendra Kumar Ghose Vs. Emperor
Option C: R. Vs. Govinda
Option D: J. M. Desai V. State of Bombay
Correct Answer
Option: a
Explanation
It is now well-settled that the common intention required by Section 34 is different from the same intention or similar intention. As has been observed by the Privy Council in Mahbub Shah v. Emperor (1945 L.R. 72 I.A.
Sample Mock Tests for Practice
THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956 (PAPER -01 Q. NO. 1 TO 14)