Question

In which case, where the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to the immense inconvenience of the opposite party, it was held by the Supreme Court that seeking adjournments for postponing the examination of witnesses who were present without making other arrangements for examining such witnesses is a dereliction of the duty that an advocate owed to the Court, amounting to misconduct?

In which case, where the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to the immense inconvenience of the opposite party, it was held by the Supreme Court that seeking adjournments for postponing the examination of witnesses who were present without making other arrangements for examining such witnesses is a dereliction of the duty that an advocate owed to the Court, amounting to misconduct?

.

Option A: N. G. Dastane v. Shrikant S. Shivde
Option B: Sambhu Ram Yadav v. Hanuman Das Khatry
Option C: Noratanman Courasia v. M.R. Murali
Option D: None of the above

Correct Answer

Option: a

Explanation

N. G. Dastane v. Shrikant S. Shivde, AIR 2001 SC 202. In this particular case, the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to the immense inconvenience of the opposite party. The Supreme Court held that seeking adjournments for postponing the examination of witnesses who were present without making other arrangements for examining such witnesses is a dereliction of the duty that an advocate owed to the Court, amounting to misconduct.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2014

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2010

UTTAR PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES LAW EXAM 2018

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2008

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956 (PAPER -01 Q. NO. 1 TO 14)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 03 Q.NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-2

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 421 TO 455)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 456 TO 490)

AIBE-XII-2018-I (BCI-JUN-2018-SET-A) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2018-I)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 25)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 06 Q.NO. 201 TO 240)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -5 Q. NO. 101 TO 134)

THE COURT FEES ACT, 1870 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 7)

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 231)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)