Question

For one academic year, all the students at a high school were observed. The aim was to test the hypothesis that studying more increased a student’s chances of earning a higher grade. It turned out that the students who spent the most time studying did not earn grades as high as did many students who studied less. Nonetheless, the researchers concluded that the results of the observation supported the initial hypothesis. Which one of the following, if true,‘most helps to explain why the researchers drew the conclusion described above?

For one academic year, all the students at a high school were observed. The aim was to test the hypothesis that studying more increased a student’s chances of earning a higher grade. It turned out that the students who spent the most time studying did not earn grades as high as did many students who studied less. Nonetheless, the researchers concluded that the results of the observation supported the initial hypothesis. Which one of the following, if true,‘most helps to explain why the researchers drew the conclusion described above?

Assorted

Option A: The students who spent the most time studying earned higher grades than did some students who studied for less time than the average.
Option B: The students tended to get slightly lower grades as the academic year progressed.
Option C: In each course, the more a student studied, the better his or her grade was in that course.
Option D: The students who spent the least time studying tended to be students with no more than average involvement in extra-curricular activities.

Correct Answer

Option: c

Explanation

Assorted

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

PUNJAB LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2009

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 231)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2014

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER NO.: 04 Q. 76 TO 100)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 1998

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE INDIAN FORESTS ACT, 1927 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 43)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 01 Q.NO. 1 TO 40)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 321 TO 360)

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 39)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 04 Q.NO. 121 TO 160)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018

THE MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 29)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 09 Q.NO. 321 TO 345)

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 26 TO 50)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2023)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2021

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -3 Q. NO. 51 TO 75)

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)