“Execution of death sentence by public hanging is barbaric and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, even if any Jail Manual provides for the same” It has been held by the Supreme Court in case of:
“Execution of death sentence by public hanging is barbaric and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, even if any Jail Manual provides for the same” It has been held by the Supreme Court in case of:
.
Option A: Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Option B: T.V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu
Option C: Attorney General of India v. Lachma Devi
Option D: Rameswar and Anr. V. State of U.P.
Correct Answer
Option: c
Explanation
The case of Attorney General of India v/s Lachma Devi 1985, dealt with the controversial issue of the right to public hanging in India. The case was brought to the Supreme Court of India to determine whether the public hanging of a convicted murderer could be considered a violation of their fundamental rights.
Sample Mock Tests for Practice
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)