Question

An advocate is under an obligation to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the pubic justice system is enabled to function at its full potential. Any violation of the principle of professional ethic by an advocate is unfortunate and unacceptable. Ignoring even a minor violation/misconduct militates against the fundamental foundation of the public justice system. It was said in:

An advocate is under an obligation to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the pubic justice system is enabled to function at its full potential. Any violation of the principle of professional ethic by an advocate is unfortunate and unacceptable. Ignoring even a minor violation/misconduct militates against the fundamental foundation of the public justice system. It was said in:

.

Option A: Hikmat Ali Khan v. Ishwar Prasad Arya, (1997) 3 SCC 131
Option B: O.P. Sharma v. High Court of Punjab & Haryana, (2011) 6 SCC 86
Option C: L.D. Jaikwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1984) 3 SCC 405
Option D: Shamsher Singh Bedi v High Court of Punjab & Haryana, (1996) 7 SCC 99.

Correct Answer

Option: b

Explanation

An advocate is under an obligation to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the pubic justice system is enabled to function at its full potential. Any violation of the principle of professional ethic by an advocate is unfortunate and unacceptable. Ignoring even a minor violation/misconduct militates against the fundamental foundation of the public justice system was observed in the case of O.P Sharma v High Court of Punjab & Haryana, (2011) 6 SCC 86.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -5 Q. NO. 101 TO 134)

THE CHHATTISGARH RENT CONTROL ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 46 TO 90)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 61 TO 90)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 456 TO 490)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 421 TO 455)

CHHATTISGARH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

G.K. PUNJABI – 01 GGSSS BNL

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2014)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 03 Q.NO. 81 TO 120)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2018)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

THE MADHYA PRADESH ACCOMODATION CONTROL ACT, 1961 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956 (PAPER -01 Q. NO. 1 TO 14)

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 04 Q.NO. 121 TO 160)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2022)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 20 Q. NO. 761 TO 800)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 1998

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 526 TO 560)