A, residing in Calcutta, is against for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z and A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A in good faith, believing that it will be more for Z’s advantage to hold shares in the Bank of Bengal, disobeys Z’s directions, and buys shares in the Bank of Bengal, for Z, instead of buying Company’s paper. Z suffers loss. A is liable for
.
Correct Answer
Explanation