Question

A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard’s skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards? For the same reason, that I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard’s skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards? For the same reason, that I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument? (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Direction: Read the following short passages and choose the best answers to the questions that follow each passage.

Option A: Human being might, in fact, be placed on the list of endangered species.
Option B: Despite the growing number of ecologists supporting a repeal of the ban on leopard hunting, most will still support it.
Option C: The international ban on leopard hunting was instituted before leopards became an endangered species.
Option D: Leopards, now dangerously overpopulated, cannot be supported by their ecosystems.

Correct Answer

Option: d

Explanation

.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2014)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2007-1

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(2)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018(1)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2016-2

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 386 TO 420)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 245)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2008

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

HARYANA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2021

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

KERALA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 45)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019-2

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2002

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 526 TO 560)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 106 TO 140)