help Help

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Understanding the Harmful Practice and the Call for its Eradication

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Understanding the Harmful Practice and the Call for its Eradication

Introduction:

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), also known as female circumcision, is a deeply rooted traditional practice that involves the partial or complete removal of the external female genitalia. This harmful practice, prevalent in various parts of the world, poses severe physical, psychological, and social consequences for girls and women. In this article, we will delve into the complexities of FGM, its prevalence, reasons behind its perpetuation, and the global efforts to eliminate this violation of human rights.

Understanding Female Genital Mutilation:

FGM encompasses various procedures that involve altering or removing female genital organs for non-medical reasons. These procedures are typically performed on girls between infancy and adolescence, often without their informed consent. FGM is prevalent in many countries, particularly in Africa, the Middle East, and some communities in Asia and Latin America.

Types and Consequences of FGM:

FGM is classified into four types based on the extent of the procedure: a) Type I: Clitoridectomy – Partial or total removal of the clitoris. b) Type II: Excision – Partial or total removal of the clitoris and the inner labia. c) Type III: Infibulation – Narrowing of the vaginal opening through the removal of the clitoris and labia, often followed by stitching. d) Type IV: Other harmful procedures – Includes pricking, piercing, or any other form of alteration.

The consequences of FGM are severe and long-lasting. They range from immediate complications such as severe pain, bleeding, infections, and difficulty in urination, to long-term health issues such as urinary and reproductive problems, psychological trauma, sexual dysfunction, and complications during childbirth.

Sociocultural Factors and Perpetuation of FGM:

FGM is deeply entrenched in cultural, social, and gender norms. It is often seen as a rite of passage, a means to control female sexuality, ensure marriageability, and preserve cultural identity. Misconceptions surrounding hygiene, purity, and religious beliefs are also used to justify this harmful practice.

Global Efforts to Eliminate FGM:

The international community, governments, human rights organizations, and grassroots movements have made significant efforts to eradicate FGM. These efforts include:

  • Legislative measures: Many countries have enacted laws and policies that criminalize FGM and provide protection to girls and women.
  • Awareness and education: Raising awareness about the harmful consequences of FGM, engaging community leaders, and promoting education are vital in challenging deep-rooted beliefs and promoting behavioral change.
  • Empowering women and girls: Supporting initiatives that empower women and girls, including education, access to healthcare, economic opportunities, and legal rights, can help break the cycle of FGM.

The Role of Health Professionals and Communities:

Health professionals play a crucial role in preventing FGM by providing accurate information, promoting sexual and reproductive health, and offering counseling and support to girls and women who have undergone or are at risk of FGM. Engaging with communities, religious leaders, and traditional practitioners is essential for creating dialogue, challenging harmful norms, and fostering community-led change.

Conclusion:

Female Genital Mutilation is a deeply entrenched practice that violates the rights, health, and well-being of girls and women. Eliminating FGM requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses the underlying sociocultural factors, promotes education, empowers women and girls, and engages communities and health professionals. By working collectively and raising awareness, we can protect the rights and dignity of girls and women and strive towards the eradication of this harmful practice, ensuring a future free from the physical and psychological consequences of FGM.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 02 Q.NO. 41 TO 80)

THE INDIAN FORESTS ACT, 1927 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 43)

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 19)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2023)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 351 TO 385)

AIBE-XV-2021-I (BCI-JAN-2021-SET-C) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2021-I)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 351 TO 385)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 13 Q. NO. 481 TO 520)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 09 Q. NO. 321 TO 360)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

THE MADHYA PRASESH LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2014)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2021

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2015

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 21 Q. NO. 801 TO 840)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 29)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

Youtube facebook whatsapp web weather translate google amazon gmail google translate Instagram cricbuzz traductor Hotmail restaurants satta king tiempo twitter googel maps Yandex Sarkari result clima hotels fb yahoo maps chatgpt yahoo mail weather tomorrow Netflix roblox nba wordle tradutor livescore premier league ibomma speed test canva pintrest outlook Instagram login omegle flipkart myntra paypal paytm Alibaba ebay lottery sambad linkedin tiktok shein bbc news real madrid gmail login Walmart ikea cricket snaptik flashscore English to hindi twitch google scholar Barcelona Sarkari Naukri matrimonial shadi lgbtq third gender woman children Advocate barrister vakil supreme court high court commissioner exams ll.b ll.m ugc net law ph.d. m.b.a. graduation degree certificate school additional session judge civil judge justice jurists crime criminology punishment capital sentence death warrant fine constitution of india criminal procedure code civil procedure code evidence act sale of goods act arbitration act all india bar exam lower judiciary higher judiciary additional district attorney contract act amendment act u.s. constitution Canada p r section article schedule judgment vacancy post Porsche louis Vuitton chanel Gucci Hermes dior cartier rolex titan tiffany & co Ferrari estee lauder coach lancome burberry prada omega yves saint Laurent Lamborghini ray-ban Armani Moncler tata reliance Givenchy celine Bentley tag Heuer sk-II can cleef & arpels bulgari Shangri-la lao feng xiang dabur baidyanath cipla birla monte carlo loewe rolls-royce bottega-veneta jaege-leCoulture Maserati valentino dolce & gabbana Salvatore Ferragamo sulwhasso tom ford Maruti Suzuki Hyundai kia intercontinental Tissot aston martin ysl beauty fendi Versace kenzo la mer longines gold price sensex human rights pollution