Shri Krishna Sharma V. State of West Bengal, 2024

R. Mahalakshmi V. A. V. Anantharaman

Shri Krishna Sharma V. State of West Bengal, 2024:

Bail cannot be cancelled merely due to non-appearance of accused before the Court

Background:

Bail under Section 436 of the CrPC 1973, is a very important provision under Article 21 “Right to life and Liberty” according to our Constitution. The Supreme Court said that not granting Bail is also a violation of right to life and liberty of a person. Similarly if bail is granted once Court cannot cancelled the bail without any proper reason. There is some conditions by which bail is granted to a person, i.e., surrender of passport, not to violate any law, not to involve any offence, not to disturb victim, not to suppress or influence the witnesses relating to the case etc. If any of these conditions are violated the bail will be
cancelled by the Court.

Facts of the Case:

The petitioner of this matter, got his bail in a matter from the High Court of Kolkata. After granting the bail the accused was called to appear before the Court, but due to the huge traffic, the accused was unable to appear before the Ld. Court on time. The High Court of Kolkata cancelled the bail of that accused for this reason. Being aggrieved by this decision of the Ld. Court the accused filed a petition in the Ld. Supreme Court.

Judgement of the Supreme Court:

The three judge bench of the Supreme Court after reviewing all the petitions, submissions and arguments of the both parties came into this conclusion that if bail has been granted, the same can be cancelled if any conditions are violated or liberty is misused. The SC said that merely because the appellant did not appear personally before the Ld. Court on time that could not have been a ground for cancellation of bail. The parameters for granting bail and cancellation of bail are totally different matter. The bail already granted only be cancelled, if it is found that the person has violated any of the conditions or misused
the liberty by influencing the witnesses or tampering the evidence.

Conclusion:

Thus the SC set aside the rejection of bail order passed by the Kolkata High Court by observing the fact that “bail cannot be cancelled merely due to non-appearance of accused before the Court”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 636)

THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 65)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 13)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2010

PUNJAB LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER NO.: 04 Q. 76 TO 100)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2019)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 141 TO 175)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 456 TO 490)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

UTTAR PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES G.K. EXAM 2018

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 456 TO 490)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 246 TO 280)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018(1)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH EXCISE ACT, 2011 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 16)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2013)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 46 TO 90)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)