Question

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 do not contain a condition that he prosecution of a company is sine qua non for prosecution of other persons. The liability of the Directors/Officers etc. is vicarious and will flow from the liability of the company/firm.

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 do not contain a condition that he prosecution of a company is sine qua non for prosecution of other persons. The liability of the Directors/Officers etc. is vicarious and will flow from the liability of the company/firm.

.

Option A: Narsing Das Tapadia Vs. Govardhan Das Pattani
Option B: Saketh India Ltd. Vs. India Securities Ltd.
Option C: K.G. Sharma Vs. Pratap Autowheels
Option D: Mohd Isaq Gulsani Vs. Rajamouli

Correct Answer

Option: d

Explanation

Offences by companies.—(1) If the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence: 6 [Provided further that where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or State Government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter.] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, — (a) “company” means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and (b) “director”, in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2021)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(2)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018-2

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2016)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 71 TO 105)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH COURTS ACT, 1976 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 23)

THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (PAPER -5 Q. NO. 101 TO 134)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2016-1

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

MADHYA PRADESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(1)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIARY 2011

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2014

GUJRAT LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019(1) & (2)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 245)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2018)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 641 TO 680)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

PUNJAB LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 01 TO 40)

THE MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 29)

MAHARASHTRA LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2022

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 03 Q. NO. 81 TO 120)

THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT, 1956 (PAPER -01 Q. NO. 1 TO 14)

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

RAJASTHAN LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2021

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 30)

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Paper 02: Q. 26 TO 50)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2020)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES EXAM 2020

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 8)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2018