Question

X’s sister was an operative in the Kapistan Secret Police, and her husband had been acting as a spy before his death. (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

X’s sister was an operative in the Kapistan Secret Police, and her husband had been acting as a spy before his death. (Answer the question after reading the following paragraph.)

Direction: A fact situation and result is presented. Numbered statements follow the result. Each statement has to be separately evaluated in relation to the fact-situation and result. Evaluate these statements with the following sequences of decisions in the order of a, b, c and d. The first of these that you cannot eliminate is the correct answer.
Situation: Major X, an able officer in the Kapistan Army, failed to receive a promotion for eight years. Then he had been reassigned to a military supply depot in Khawalpindi, despite his university training in engineering and electronics, and his remarkably high performance ratings from his commanding officers. X had never been an active member of any political party as a youth nor as an adult, yet neither had he given the party or his superiors any cause to doubt his absolute loyalty to Kapistan. X’s brother-in-law had been a diplomat in the Kapistan government until his death in 1971 in a plane crash on Koviet soil while he was working in the Kapistan Embassy in Kosco. X had always assumed that the mishap was indeed an accident, until his friend Y. a middle-level officer in the Interior Ministry, broadly hinted that the plane crash had been an act of sabotage. Soon after the talk with Y, X visited his sister, the diplomat’s widow, in her Kosco apartment. During the visit she asked X several questions that struck him as strange and inappropriate. As he was leaving her apartment, she asked X to wear her late husband’s scarf and to return to his hotel by way of a certain park. Bewildered, but not wishing to offend his sister, X obeyed her odd instructions.
Result: Two months later, X received a promotion and was made Commander of the Kapistan missile division in Kahore.

Option A: If the statement is inconsistent with, or contradicts, the fact situation, the result, or both together. If so Choose (a).
Option B: If the statement present a possible adequate explanation of the result.
Option C: If the statement is deducible from something in the fact-situation, or the result, or both together.
Option D: If the statement either supports or weakens a possible explanation of the result.

Correct Answer

Option: b

Explanation

.

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

UTTARAKHAND LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 (PAPER-01 Q. NO. 1 TO 21)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

DELHI LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2014

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 22 Q. NO. 841 TO 870)

THE HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 65)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 14 Q. NO. 521 TO 560)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 401 TO 440)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2013

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 201 TO 240)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 02 Q.NO. 41 TO 80)

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

AILET – National Law University Delhi Entrance Test (NLU 2017)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 491 TO 525)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 20 Q. NO. 761 TO 800)

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 41 TO 80)

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 45)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 15 Q. NO. 561 TO 600)

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 12)

THE HIMACHAL PRADESH URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT, 1987 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 10 Q. NO. 361 TO 400)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)

UTTAR PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES LAW EXAM 2018

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2001

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2019

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 596 TO 623)