help Help
Facebook-f Instagram

IN RE: THE BERUBARI CASE: 14 MARCH, 1960

IN RE: THE BERUBARI CASE: 14 MARCH, 1960

EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: AIR 1960 SC 845, 1960 3 SCR 250

History/ Facts

  • The issue was started during the partition of India.
  • Sir Cyril Radcliff, the Chairman of the Borders Commission, had the responsibility of delineating the border between East and West Bengal.
  • During partition in the Jalpaiguri area, certain thanas were to be divided.
  • The Radcliff Award merged the Berubari region of Jalpaiguri District into the Indian Union, but Thana Boda was omitted from the award.
  • This mistake made Pakistan claim territory of its own in 1948.
  • The Lord Bagge Tribunal was set up to address certain kinds of boundary disputes, and a report was submitted in 1950 that was never objected to by Pakistan.
  • The Government of Pakistan claimed its right over the Berubari Union again in 1952.
  • Bidhan Chandra Roy, the then Chief Minister of West Bengal, got the State Assembly to pass a resolution against the illegal demand of Pakistan.
  • In the meantime, an agreement was signed between India and Pakistan, known as the Nehru-Noon agreement, to divide the territory of the Berubari Union. The government of West Bengal opposed it. After this, the Union referred the matter to the Supreme Court.

Legal Issues

1. Is it necessary to take any legislative action to carry out an agreement relating to the Berubari union?

2. Is Article 3 of the Constitution of India, 1950, sufficient for such an agreement?

3. Is there a need for amendment under Article 368 of the Constitution for such action?

Arguments by Government

  • There is no cession of land
  • The agreement is only a mere settlement of a boundary dispute by exchanging land.
  • So there is no legislative intervention required

Arguments against exchange

  • According to the preamble of the Constitution of India, parliament has no right to alter the territory of the country
  • According to Article 1(3)(c) of the Constitution, the government can only acquire territories without ceding any territory.

Judgment delivered

The Supreme Court in the Berubari Union case concluded that:

  • ‘Preamble is the key to opening the minds of the makers’ but the preamble is not a part of the Constitution. Therefore, it is not enforceable in a court of law.
  • The Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, including Article 1.
  • Article 1(3)(c) does not confer power or authority on India to acquire territories.
  • Article 1 needs to be amended first by the parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution if it decides to first pass a law making amendments to Article 1 as stated above.
  • Legislative approval is necessary for the implementation of the agreement relating to the Berubari Union.

Conclusion

After the judgment in the Berubari case, Parliament passed the 9th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1960, which was enacted to provide the basis for the Nehru-Noon agreement.

Similarly, the 100th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2015, was enacted, which allows the exchange of territory between India and Bangladesh.

Youtube facebook whatsapp web weather translate google amazon gmail google translate Instagram cricbuzz traductor Hotmail restaurants satta king tiempo twitter googel maps Yandex Sarkari result clima hotels fb yahoo maps chatgpt yahoo mail weather tomorrow Netflix roblox nba wordle tradutor livescore premier league ibomma speed test canva pintrest outlook Instagram login omegle flipkart myntra paypal paytm Alibaba ebay lottery sambad linkedin tiktok shein bbc news real madrid gmail login Walmart ikea cricket snaptik flashscore English to hindi twitch google scholar Barcelona Sarkari Naukri matrimonial shadi lgbtq third gender woman children Advocate barrister vakil supreme court high court commissioner exams ll.b ll.m ugc net law ph.d. m.b.a. graduation degree certificate school additional session judge civil judge justice jurists crime criminology punishment capital sentence death warrant fine constitution of india criminal procedure code civil procedure code evidence act sale of goods act arbitration act all india bar exam lower judiciary higher judiciary additional district attorney contract act amendment act u.s. constitution Canada p r section article schedule judgment vacancy post Porsche louis Vuitton chanel Gucci Hermes dior cartier rolex titan tiffany & co Ferrari estee lauder coach lancome burberry prada omega yves saint Laurent Lamborghini ray-ban Armani Moncler tata reliance Givenchy celine Bentley tag Heuer sk-II can cleef & arpels bulgari Shangri-la lao feng xiang dabur baidyanath cipla birla monte carlo loewe rolls-royce bottega-veneta jaege-leCoulture Maserati valentino dolce & gabbana Salvatore Ferragamo sulwhasso tom ford Maruti Suzuki Hyundai kia intercontinental Tissot aston martin ysl beauty fendi Versace kenzo la mer longines    gold price sensex human rights pollution

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sample Mock Tests for Practice

CLAT 2015

CLAT 2020

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 18 Q. NO. 681 TO 720)

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 60)

THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 35)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 17 Q. NO. 561 TO 595)

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 (PAPER 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 135)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2012

THE HINDU ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE ACT, 1956 (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 31 TO 39)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 09 Q.NO. 321 TO 345)

MADHYA PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 1998

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 08 Q. NO. 281 TO 320)

HIMACHAL PARDESH LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES 2011

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 05 Q. NO. 161 TO 200)

THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 15)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 211 TO 245)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 40)

THE LAW OF TORTS (PAPER 02 Q. NO. 46 TO 90)

THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 25)

THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 (PAPER 03 Q.NO. 81 TO 120)

THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 15)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 20 Q. NO. 761 TO 800)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 19 Q. NO. 721 TO 760)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 11 Q. NO. 351 TO 385)

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 22 Q. NO. 841 TO 874)

AIBE-XIV-2019 (BCI-SEPT-2019-SET-D) (ALL INDIA BAR EXAM 2019)

BIHAR LOWER JUDICIAL SERVICES EXAM 2020

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 07 Q. NO. 241 TO 280)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 04 Q. NO. 121 TO 160)

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 (PAPER – 12 Q. NO. 441 TO 480)

THE MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS (PAPER 01 Q. NO. 1 TO 29)

CLAT 2012

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (PAPER – 16 Q. NO. 601 TO 640)

THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 (PAPER – 02 Q. NO. 36 TO 70)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949 (PAPER – 06 Q. NO. 176 TO 210)

Load More